![]() But something I think even nVidia wasn’t prepared for was the insanely high demand the nVidia fan base was going to have on this particular release. For I’d have remained in U.S until 4th June, and these dates were aligning perfectly. I happened to be in the U.S during this launch, and had my hopes set high when the launch date for the GTX 1080s were announced to be 27th May. Which was no different for me, and I’d already started to gather PC parts for a brand new build I was putting together, to replace my desktop replacement laptop! If it built Vega 7nm for a handful of specific customers, it may have already planned to allocate 100 percent of its 7nm GPU production to machine learning and AI markets, where margins are much higher.ĪMD's RX 590 is widely expected to drop in the next few weeks, but past that, Team Red gamers will have to wait for Navi to see if it offers better challenge to NV in these markets.This was a brand new era, a GPU far beyond its time, and every single headline about it left the fans wanting a piece of that GTX 1080 so bad. It's not that Vega 64 couldn't use a 25 percent performance increase, but that the cost of bringing the chip to consumers has to be balanced against whatever allocation of fab space AMD has managed to secure. While 7nm yielded definite performance improvements, a 7nm Vega is only supposed to be 25 percent faster than the base GPU (with no details on how that performance was tested, making it impossible to know how much of it would translate into gaming). Based on what the company communicated at its New Horizons event this week, there's not going to be a consumer Vega GPU on 7nm. Gamers who hoped that AMD would be launching some kind of killer Vega GPU to take on Turing should retire those expectations. Unfortunately, it looks as though Nvidia will continue to compete mostly with itself at the top of the market, at least for the foreseeable future. If you're intending a purchase, in other words, it's a good idea to buy before the end of the year. If the Trump Administration's trade war with China continues to escalate, we could see 25 percent tariffs slapped on GPUs by the beginning of January. Separately from this, GamersNexus reports that hardware manufacturers are attempting to pull in GPU stocks into US warehouses before tariffs start kicking in come January, to buffer the impact of higher prices. The RTX 2080 is slightly faster than the 1080 Ti in virtually every title. As such, there's really not much argument to make in favor of the 1080 Ti in the first place. The current RTX 2080 is selling for $769 on Newegg, while the GTX 1080 Ti has risen to $759. With that said, there's actually not much difference between the two. The company isn't interested in selling last-generation GPUs that conflict with its own current products - it wants you to step up to the RTX 2080. ![]() From Nvidia's perspective, this makes perfect sense. According to an investigation by GamersNexus (Opens in a new window), production on the 1080 Ti stopped earlier this month. The GTX 1060, 1070, and 1080 are all expected to remain in-market for the foreseeable future, but stocks of the GTX 1080 Ti are falling quickly. A major part of the justification for the RTX GPUs price increases was the new ray tracing and antialiasing features baked into these cards, but neither capability is currently available in shipping titles. Our own argument has been that these cards are not worth the substantially increased investment Nvidia demands you pay for them, at least not right now. When Nvidia launched the RTX GPU family almost two months ago, it immediately kicked off a fight in the enthusiast community over whether or not the RTX 20 Ti were appropriate replacements for the GTX 1070, 1080, and 1080 Ti.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |